Skip past navigation to main part of page
 
MGSE Home : Search : Sitemap
---

Science and Mathematics Education Seminar Series 2008

Below is a timetable of upcoming seminars for 2008. To view past seminars please visit our seminar archive page.

UPCOMING SEMINARS FOR 2008
DATE
LOCATION & TIME
TITLE
SPEAKER
September 5th

Room 1018, Doug McDonell Building, level 10
Commences at: 2.15pm

STEM pathways: a response to issues raised participation in a DEEWR literature review Abstract

John Cripps Clark
ICT in Research and Education, University of Melbourne

October 10th Room 1018, Doug McDonell Building, level 10
Commences at: 2.15pm
BOOK LAUNCH: 'Pedagogies of the imagination' published by Springer, 2008. The Four Melbourne authors will speak about their contributions and the theme of the book More information

James Bradbeer
Abdul Ghafoor Abdul Raheem
Gerry Healy
Rod Fawns

PAST SEMINARS FROM 2008
DATE
LOCATION & TIME
TITLE
SPEAKERS
August 8th Room 1018, Doug McDonell Building, level 10
Commences at: 2.15pm
Constructing Versatile Mathematical Conceptions Abstract Associate Professor Mike Thomas
Mathematics Education Unit
Department of Mathematics
The University of Auckland New Zealand
July 25th Room 711, Doug McDonell Building, level 7
Commences at: 2.15pm
Impressions and Ideas from Recent Conferences - open discussion of impressions of changes and new ideas in the field of science and mathematics education. More information
Professor Kaye Stacey
Foundation Professor of Mathematics Education
University of Melbourne
June 20th Room 706, Doug McDonell Building, level 7
Commences at: 2.15pm
Some key junctures in relational thinking
Dr Max Stephens
Honorary Fellow in Mathematics Education
University of Melbourne
June 6th Room 706, Doug McDonell Building, level 7
Commences at: 2.15pm
Researching Future Teachers’ Competencies to Teach Secondary Mathematics: Designing and refining tools in an international collaborative team
Dr Gloria Stillman
Lecturer in mathematics education
University of Melbourne
April 18th Room 1018, Doug McDonell Building, level 10. Commences at 2.15pm
Modes of reasoning in explanations in Year 8 textbooks Abstract
Prof Kaye Stacey & Dr Jill Vincent , Mathematics Education, University of Melbourne
April 11th Room 1018, Doug McDonell Building, level 10
Commences at: 2.15pm
PhD Completion seminar Abstract
Robert De La Serna, PhD student in Mathematics Education postgraduate student
University of Melbourne
March 14th
Room 706, Doug McDonell Building, level 7
Commences at: 2.30pm
(Both academics will speak for 30 minutes each)

Algebraic Argumentation: Instructional Design and the Students’ Learning Effect Abstract

Ing-Er Chen
Teacher Education CENTRE, Fooyin University, Taiwan

Evaluating a Series of Learning about “Teaching Mathematics” Abstract

Ru-Fen Yao
National Chia-Yi University

February 28th Room 706, Doug McDonell Building, level 7
Commences at: 2.15pm
PhD Completion Seminar
Dawn Ng, PhD student in mathematics education, University of Melbourne

Book Launch - Pedagogies of the imagination

James Bradbeer
Abdul Ghafoor Abdul Raheem
Gerry Healy
Rod Fawns

In July 2005 an invited residential seminar held at the University of Melbourne investigated imagination and mythopeisis in the curriculum in educational practise. Participants from Australia, Canada and the USE spoke from their research and experience about intellectual purposes and their accomplishment in a range of academic and practical fields including education. The enquiries depart from the instrumental in shaping school and university curricula to give fuller plat to expressive relations with people, objects of meaning and human imagination in our methods and goals. The book, Pedagogies of the imagination, was recently published by Springer and edited by Tim Leonard (Chicago) and Peter Willis (South Australia). The book has been launched in both Chicago and Adelaide.

STEM pathways: a response to issues raised participation in a DEEWR literature review

John Cripps Clark
ICT in Research and Education, University of Melbourne

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) is seen as increasingly important to young peoples’ success in an information-rich world and building Australia’s capacity. STEM skills and knowledge are seen as essential to meeting the challenges of the new century.
This talk outlines the findings of a review of the literature on the barriers and supports that young people encounter in pursuing studies in STEM disciplines in Australia conducted for DEEWR and my personal response to some of the issues that arose as a member of the team led by Russell Tytler.
The report reviews literature across a variety of disciplines on trends in STEM participation in Australia and globally, and investigated existing and ongoing research and literature on the reasons why people either continue or discontinue study and employment in STEM related fields. The review focused on the issue of transition, examining specifically changes and continuities in attitudes to STEM subjects as students make the transition from primary to secondary school, and from the middle to upper secondary school years. It identified issues bearing on student pathways in STEM, profiles the existing STEM workforce, and describes broad trends in engagement in STEM in Australia.

 

Impressions and Ideas from Recent Conferences
Convened by Professor Kaye Stacey
Foundation Professor of Mathematics Education, University of Melbourne

This is an open and informal discussion whereby all academics and students who have recently attended conferences are invited to share with the audience some of their impressions of changes in the field and the most interesting ideas encountered.

 

Constructing Versatile Mathematical Conceptions

Associate Professor Mike Thomas
Mathematics Education Unit, Department of Mathematics, The University of Auckland New Zealand

In this talk I describe the idea of versatile mathematical thinking as comprising: process/object; visuo/analytic; and representational versatility. Examples, taken from algebra, calculus and linear algebra, will be presented to illustrate the role of these three aspects in building student conceptions, and some advantages of versatile mathematical thinking. In addition, ways in which such versatility may be mediated through an informed use of technology, and the implications for teachers’ pedagogical technology knowledge (PTK) will be discussed.

Algebraic Argumentation: Instructional Design and Students’ Learning Effect

Ing-Er Chen
Teacher Education CENTRE, Fooyin University, Taiwan

This study is a four-year project which was to design algebraic worksheets for students to experience the thinking processes of mathematical conjecturing. We explored the theoretical backing for instructional design, developed learning aids, conducted lesson studies and evaluated the effect of learning aids and class teaching. In this talk, I will give one example of the Consecutive Numbers problems: the sum of n consecutive integers is always an even number to share with you my research result and research experience. This mini study investigated what is the key mechanism to affect the success in conjecturing activity. There were 35, 38, 39 students belonging to three classes of grade 7, 8, 9 in the study. They were asked to answer the questions and write down their ideas in 40 minutes in the classroom. The results were: there were 62.9%, 84.3% and 87.2% students in grade 7, 8, 9 who were able to propose at least one conjecture. And less than 3% students in grade 7 and 8, and 18% students in grade 9 could propose one more conjectures. Most students gave examples when they were asked to give more conjectures. In addition, we found that there were 22.9%, 28.9% and 43.6% students in grade 7, 8, 9 using conditional terms to describe the common property. “Give an example” and “Use conditional terms” are two important mechanisms to make conjectures successfully.

*************************************************************************************************************

Evaluating a Series of Learning about “Teaching Mathematics”

Ru-Fen Yao
National Chia-Yi University

The main purpose of this research is to share a useful experience of how postgraduate students evaluate the different activities of a course named “Research on mathematics teaching design”. Based on the viewpoints from Cochran, DeRuiter, & King (1993) and Shulman (1986, 1987), the researcher arrange a series of learning about “teaching mathematics” for the participants. There are five learning activities—“Knowing mathematics curriculum and poster making,” “Evaluating examples of designing mathematics instruction” “Literature review on mathematics misconception,” “Mathematics teaching/learning Q&A,” and “Mathematics teaching design and practice” arranged in this course to improve participants’ knowledge of mathematics curriculum, ability of mathematics instructional design, and understanding about student’s mathematics learning. With classroom observation, questionnaire survey, and related document analysis, the researcher mainly explores into the level of preference and opinions of participants toward these five learning activities, and whether the series of learning about “mathematics teaching” may facilitate their professional development. The results show that 1) the most preferred one in five activities is “Mathematics teaching design and practice”, the one ranked the second is “Mathematics teaching/learning Q&A”, and “Literature review on mathematics misconception” is less preferred activity. 2) Other than “Knowing mathematics curriculum and poster making,” the other four activities arranged by the researcher are all highly praised for their effectiveness of improving mathematics instruction.

THE LANGUAGE IN MATHEMATICS, THE MATHEMATICS OF LANGUAGE: An empirical measure of language-in-use efficiency in algebra learning

Robert de la Serna
PhD student, Science and Mathematics Education

This study investigates the effectiveness and efficiency of mathematics instruction in two language modes (English vs. Cebuano/English Code-Switching) on the performances of 450 Filipino algebra students in 11 classes of a Philippine private high school. Conducted in 2005-2006, a quasi-experiment addressed the question: Between the two languages of instruction, which promotes better algebra learning among Filipino bilingual students? The analyses evaluate the performances of both the high-ability (comprising 3 classes) and average ability students (comprising 8 classes) using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) to compare the effectiveness of languages-in-use on student achievement, and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)—a novel economic modelling approach—to measure the relative efficiencies of student learning outcomes. The seminar will share some of the study’s findings.


Modes of reasoning in explanations in Year 8 textbooks

Dr Jill Vincent and Professor Kaye Stacey
Science and Mathematics Education, University of Melbourne

Understanding that mathematics is not just an arbitrary collection of rules to follow is basic to good mathematics learning, but studies show that many classrooms exhibit little mathematical reasoning. In order to better understand the nature of reasoning in schools, in a preliminary study we examined the modes of explicit reasoning in the explanations, justification and proofs of several topics in four textbooks. Several distinct modes of reasoning were identified. We are now in the process of developing a taxonomy to cover the range of explanations that are used in mathematics classrooms and textbooks. Feedback on these classifications will be sought from the audience.

top of pagetop of page

Contact Us

Contact the University : Disclaimer & Copyright : Privacy : Accessibility

Date created:
5 March 2008
Last modified:
18 August 2008 16:26:41
Authoriser:
Kaye Stacey, Foundation Chair of Mathematics Education, Melbourne Graduate School of Education
Maintainer:
Sara Jean Brimfield
Email:
sbrim@unimelb.edu.au